Who’s Accountable at Machine Speed?
Three security leaders on where AI ends and human judgment has to begin. Five weeks after Fal.Con, once the keynote glow has worn off. No slides, no demo, mostly argument. Recorded live on October 8, 2026.
Free to watch. No registration needed.
Every vendor in Las Vegas promised an AI-driven SOC. Almost none of them answered the question a CISO actually has to answer:
What are you willing to let it do without asking you first?
Detection at machine speed is no longer the hard part. The hard part is the decision that follows it — isolating a host in the middle of a trading day, disabling an executive’s account an hour before a board meeting, blocking traffic that turns out to be a customer. Those calls carry consequences that land on a person, not a model.
Five weeks after Fal.Con, three security leaders sat down for a candid, vendor-neutral conversation about where they’ve drawn the line between automated action and human judgment, what it costs them on each side of it, and what they now demand from anyone selling them “autonomous” security.
Moderated by Kevin Nejad, CEO of Vijilan. No slides. No demo. One hour, mostly argument.
“Who’s Accountable at Machine Speed?” is a panel hosted by Vijilan Security and recorded live on Thursday, October 8, 2026. Three panelists from autonomous defense, offensive security and governance discuss where automated SOC action should stop and a human should decide, moderated by Kevin Nejad, CEO of Vijilan. It is vendor-neutral, with no slides and no demo. The full recording is free to watch, with no registration, at vijilan.com/webinar/machine-speed.
What you’ll leave with
Five things you can use on Monday.
A working autonomy model
The four tiers of SOC action (observe → enrich → recommend → act) and which of your controls belong in each.
The blast-radius test
How experienced leaders decide whether an automated action is reversible enough to permit, and what they do about the ones that aren’t.
The accountability chain
What your board, your auditor, and your cyber-insurance carrier will ask about AI-driven decisions, and what evidence satisfies them.
A vendor questionnaire you can use immediately
The questions that separate a genuine machine-speed-plus-judgment operation from an alert queue with a language model attached.
The economics both ways
An honest look at what human review at scale actually costs, from the people paying for it.
The panel
People who’ve had to make this call.
OffenseSean Nobles, OSCP, MBAPresident, NaviSec
Read bio
President, NaviSec
Breaks in for a living, so he knows what the automation misses.
Sean comes from NaviSec, a minority and veteran owned firm founded in Tampa in 2015 that does human-driven penetration testing alongside 24/7 managed detection and response and CMMC readiness. NaviSec has been an MSSP Alert Top MSSP honoree eight years running and its team holds CISSP, OSCP and CRTP among others. The offensive seat matters here because the people who get past controls for a living have the clearest view of which automated responses an attacker can predict, and therefore plan around.
Autonomous defenseCurt AubleyCEO and Cofounder, Sevii
Read bio
CEO and Cofounder, Sevii
Builds the thing the rest of the panel is nervous about.
Curt cofounded and runs Sevii, which describes its platform as Level 5 Autonomous Defense and Remediation and says in its own words that its agents work "with no humans in the loop." Sevii integrates with CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM, was selected for the 2026 CrowdStrike, AWS and NVIDIA Cybersecurity Startup Accelerator, and showed at Fal.Con. If the question is where automation should stop, he is the person on this panel arguing it should stop later than everyone else, and he has built a product on that conviction.
GovernanceDominic GenzanoCybersecurity advisory and vCISO practice lead, Vijilan
Read bio
Cybersecurity advisory and vCISO practice lead, Vijilan
Has to write down who is accountable, before it matters.
Dominic leads Vijilan’s cybersecurity advisory and vCISO practice, which puts him on the governance side of this argument: the frameworks, the audit trail, and the question of who signs for an automated action that turns out wrong. Machine-speed response is a governance problem before it is a technical one, and the paperwork has to exist before the incident rather than after it.
Moderated by Kevin Nejad, CEO, Vijilan Security
Runs the SOC whose analysts make this call every night, which makes him the right person to press three people who each draw the line somewhere different.
Recorded live · October 8, 2026 · On demand
Watch the recordingThe companion worksheet
The Autonomy Line
A two-page worksheet that turns the conversation into something you can run against your own environment: the four tiers of automated action, a grid for placing your own controls, a reversibility test, and twelve questions to put to any vendor claiming an autonomous SOC. Vendor-neutral by design.
Sent by email to everyone who registered for the live panel.
Who this is for
Security leaders at enterprises and mid-market organizations
You own the risk, the board conversation, and the consequence of a wrong automated action.
MSP, MSSP and vCISO leaders
You’re making this call across many environments at once, under economics that don’t allow a human on every decision.
If you’re the one who has to answer for the decision, this hour is for you.
Watch the replay.
Recorded live Thursday, October 8, 2026 · Free to watch.
- The full session, moderated. No slides, no demo.
- Free to watch on this page. No registration needed.
Questions? info@vijilan.com · +1 (954) 334-9988
On demand
The recording is at the top of this page
Registration has closed now the panel has aired. The full session is free to watch here, with nothing to fill in.
Watch the replayBefore you watch
Questions people ask.
- How much does it cost to watch?
- Nothing. The full recording is on this page, free, with no registration.
- When was it recorded?
- Live on Thursday, October 8, 2026, 1:00–2:00 PM ET. The recording is the session as it aired.
- Who is on the panel?
- Three panelists: Curt Aubley, CEO and cofounder of Sevii; Sean Nobles, President of NaviSec; and Dominic Genzano, who leads Vijilan’s cybersecurity advisory and vCISO practice. Moderated by Kevin Nejad, CEO of Vijilan. Full bios are on this page.
- Is this a product pitch?
- No. It is a vendor-neutral conversation with no slides and no demo. The panel argues about where automated action should stop and a person should decide; Vijilan moderates rather than presents.
- What is the worksheet?
- “The Autonomy Line” — two pages covering the four-tier action grid (observe, enrich, recommend, act), the reversibility test for sorting automated actions, and twelve questions to put to anyone selling an autonomous SOC.
24/7 SOC · SOC 2 Type II · ISO 27001 · White-label
CrowdStrike®, Falcon®, and Fal.Con are trademarks of CrowdStrike, Inc. Vijilan is a CrowdStrike Powered Service Provider (CPSP); this event is Vijilan’s own and is not sponsored or endorsed by CrowdStrike. Panelists speak in a personal capacity; their views are their own and do not represent their employers.